The holiday season is typically a time of joy and celebration, but this year, the specter of impeachment hangs heavy over the Philippines. The move to impeach Vice President Sara Duterte, following investigations into alleged extrajudicial killings during her father’s presidency, misuse of confidential funds allocated to her office as Secretary of Education, and accusations of political maneuvering related to the upcoming midterm elections, has ignited a firestorm of controversy and threatens to further fracture an already deeply divided nation. This isn’t simply a political squabble; it’s a potential crisis with far-reaching consequences for the country’s stability and progress. The specific allegations, such as the reported use of confidential funds for purposes other than those stated, and the timing of the investigations so close to elections, fuel suspicions of partisan motivations.

---

---

The arguments for impeachment center on allegations of wrongdoing and the need for accountability. The investigations, while raising serious concerns about the potential abuse of power and disregard for due process, have also been criticized for their apparent selectivity and timing, seemingly coinciding with the upcoming midterm elections. For example, the focus on the Vice President’s actions while simultaneously overlooking similar allegations against other officials raises questions about the fairness and impartiality of the process. This fuels the perception of a politically motivated attack designed to weaken a key figure in the current administration, potentially hindering the President’s agenda and destabilizing the government. The perception of partisan maneuvering is further amplified by the involvement of specific leftist groups and the history of intense political rivalries within the Philippines, deepening public distrust and fueling existing societal divisions.

President Bongbong Marcos’s call for unity and his opposition to the impeachment proceedings highlight the potential for national disruption. The President wisely recognizes that an impeachment trial would further polarize the country, diverting attention and resources from pressing issues like the ongoing economic recovery efforts following the pandemic and the need for significant social reforms. The potential for unrest, reminiscent of past political upheavals like the People Power Revolution, is a significant concern, especially given the already tense political climate and the potential for violent clashes between opposing factions. The Vice President’s own strong stance, as evidenced by her recent public appearances and statements, and her determination to defend herself will undoubtedly prolong the conflict and further inflame tensions, potentially leading to prolonged social and political instability.

The impeachment process itself, while constitutionally sound, is a lengthy and complex undertaking. The high threshold for conviction in the Senate—requiring a two-thirds majority vote—underscores the gravity of the accusations and the need for overwhelming evidence. However, the current political climate suggests that even if the impeachment fails, the process itself will inflict significant damage. The question remains: will the pursuit of impeachment outweigh the potential damage to national unity and stability? Will the country’s resources and attention be better spent on addressing the underlying issues of corruption and political polarization, or on a protracted and potentially divisive impeachment trial?

Beyond the immediate political ramifications, the ongoing conflict raises serious questions about national security. The perception of instability, fueled by highly publicized infighting among top government officials, could negatively impact investor confidence, leading to economic downturn, and damage international relations, potentially affecting crucial alliances and foreign aid. It’s a valid concern for ordinary citizens to wonder if the current situation is deliberately designed to project an image of weakness and disarray, potentially making the Philippines a more vulnerable target for external threats.

The current presidential system, with its inherent power struggles, is clearly contributing to the current crisis. While a shift to a federal-parliamentary system might offer a more stable and less conflict-ridden framework for governance, that’s a discussion for another day. For now, the immediate priority is to de-escalate the situation and find a path towards national reconciliation. The pursuit of impeachment, in its current context, appears to be a high-stakes gamble with potentially devastating consequences for the Philippines. The focus should shift towards addressing the underlying issues of corruption and political polarization through constructive dialogue and collaborative efforts, not through divisive legal matters that threatened to tear nation apart.

In conclusion, the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte present a critical juncture for the Philippines. While accountability is crucial, the timing, the specific allegations, and the potential consequences of this action raise serious concerns. The risk of further polarizing the nation, diverting attention from crucial issues like economic recovery and social reform, and undermining national security outweighs the potential benefits of pursuing impeachment at this time. A more constructive approach, focusing on dialogue, reconciliation, and addressing the root causes of political division, is essential to safeguarding the stability and future of the country. The pursuit of justice should not come at the cost of national unity and progress.

Great Filipinos, our move.